Hi Jie,
Thanks for your comments.
In this document, there are not any extensions to describe resource reservation
per algo. Are you aiming at another draft
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-cp-lsr-fa-aware-te/) ? Please find out
what you are talking about first.
Adj-SID per algo can distinguish traffic behavior in local. You are welcome to
add more usecases based on section 3.
Regards,
PSF
------------------原始邮件------------------
发件人：Dongjie(Jimmy)
收件人：Christian Hopps;[email protected];
日 期 ：2021年05月28日 11:40
主 题 ：Re: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
Advertisement"
Hi,
I don't support the adoption of this document.
It seems this document aims to introduce per Flex-Algo Adj-SID to SR-MPLS, its
typical use case is to provide protection path with Flex-Algo constraints for
Adj-SID of a particular Flex-Algo, which is described in the case 3 of section
3.
However, section 3 and section 5 shows that it also aims to introduce further
changes to the usage and operation of Flex-Algo, which is to provide resource
reservation based on Flex-Algo. IMO these changes to Flex-Algo deserves further
discussion and is not only related to the per Flex-Algo Adj-SID extension.
Here are some comments about this change to Flex-Algo:
1. Flex-Algo defines the constraints for path computation in a distributed
manner, it is not for resource reservation.
2. Reserving resources for each Flex-Algo on a link does not make sense. The
correlation between Flex-Algo and the network links is based on administrative
groups (color), and the color of the link may or may not be included in the
Flex-Algo definition. To follow the color based link correlation, a more
practical approach would be to use Flex-Algo with L2 bundle as defined in
draft-zhu-lsr-isis-sr-vtn-flexalgo, which uses color to correlate the L3 link
and the L2 member link to a Flex-Algo, this avoids the extension for
per-FlexAlgo resource reservation.
3. The Flex-Algo link TE attributes are advertised using ASLA, the TE
attributes are shared by all Flex-Algos which include the link according to the
FAD, and based on previous discussion, it seems there is no intention to
introduce per Flex-Algo ID link attributes.
Best regards,
Jie
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lsr [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Christian Hopps
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2021 4:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [Lsr] LSR WG Adoption Call for "Algorithm Related IGP-Adjacency SID
> Advertisement"
>
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-lsr-algorithm-related-adjacency-sid
> /
>
> Please indicate your support or objections by June 9th, 2021
>
> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
> IPR
> that applies to this draft.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee and Chris.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
