Les,

> Here, I am not convinced that there is broad WG consensus that this is a 
> problem that the IGPs should solve. (If I am wrong on that I presume the WG 
> members will let me know.)


I can’t believe what I’m hearing.  The problem that we’re solving is IGP 
scalability. Your saying that IGPs shouldn’t scale better????

I’m having a hard time believing that this is you, Les.


> I realize that you are not the one asking for WG LC and I don’t know when you 
> plan to do so and I am not trying to influence you in that regard.


Me, I’m ready to ask that we just progress Area Proxy to RFC as experimental.


> As regards you trying to solve a real world customer ask, I was aware of 
> that. And I believe the authors of flood-reflection can make the same claim.


So then why are you accusing us of something else?

Tony


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to