On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 8:05 PM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> wrote:
> ... > > I don’t believe the WG has reached consensus that the IGPs should be > extended to address the problem. > AFAI the process for that is an adoption call. And with a quick look I see you on Sun, Jun 21, 2020 supporting the adoption of @ least the reflection draft and working on the problem space so what I read here is wildly inconsistent in my eyes. I think I also responded with a detailed answer then why the "hierarchical isis" draft will likely not scratch the itch I am asked to scratch. That seemed to close the thread to your satisfaction. > I don’t believe the WG has reached consensus as to which solution is > “better”. > > I don’t believe the WG has even discussed whether a single solution or > multiple solutions are required. > > If multiple solutions are required, there has been no discussion as to > when each of the solutions should be used. Are there some deployment > scenarios where flood-reflection is a better fit and some where area proxy > is a better fit? > > Is there a need for additional solutions i.e., deployments where neither > of the current candidates are suitable? > Drafts have been there for 2 years more or less & I don't remember you showing particular interest in it on the 50 odds threads regarding reflection at least that I find on mailing list in addition to all the private reviews/comments I got ... At least from my side the progress was well documented and co-authorship of other vendors was invited more than once. So, frankly, I acknowledge your current feelings and opinions without any hard technical input but the world needed the problem solved, things had to move in a timely manner & so the world now deploys the solution that meets the requirements and was converged on technically in IETF and having an RFC has really as always just the function of having a "stable snapshot" and facilitate RFPs ... so, ? -- tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
