>
> if the router supports NSR or NSF such event will be invisible to other
> routers, including ABR. Without these mechanisms the neighboring routers
> would tear down the adjacency anyway.
>

So are you going to add to the draft special handling in this case ?

There is difference between losing adj due to restart for few seconds and
keeping the damage within an area to blasting PULSES globally when it
happens.

Note also that even if we loose adj data plane can stay intact in some area
topologies with GR enabled.

So it is becoming quite interesting to capture this or if not provide
sufficient and easy guidelines to operators to tune PULSEs to match their
network.

yes, the ingress PE reacting to Pulse would have to re-evaluate the BGP
> best paths of affected prefixes after the pulse expiration.


"would have to" sounds like a normative MUST to me. Is this going to be
also captured in the new version of the draft ?

Thx,
R.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to