Hi, Robert: Aijun Wang China Telecom
> On Jan 13, 2022, at 22:29, Robert Raszuk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> [WAJ] VLAN interface is the logical interfaces that connected to servers >> that are out side of the IGP domain. It is also different from the inter-AS >> link that described in RFC5316 and RFC5392. >> Some information that related to the attached severs or some policy to these >> server can be applied to these kind stub link. > > > Let's observe that there can be 4K VLANs on each trunk interface on a given > PE. There can be multiple trunks attached to each edge node going to switches > then in form of subnets to physical or virtual computes/pods/VMs etc... . > > Are we ready to take the product of (# of PEs) * (N trunks from each PE) * > (Max 4K VLANs) in the form of new links into even local area IGP ? > Especially as we are learning that some of the values carried may be dynamic > in nature. [WAJ]If there are so many of servers attached around all the PEs, we certainly need all of the associated servers’ prefixes. Right? If you want to some traffic engineering from/to these servers, or some policies on the boundary, you should also need additional attributes of them. Stub-Link TLV just the container for these information. > > Thx, > R. >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
