Hi Acee, > I’d consider this out-of-band signaling with respect to the IGP as well.
Are you saying this as co-chair ? If so does this indicate that LSR WG charter would prohibit this type of work from proceeding in this WG with the exception of the autodiscovery piece ? Thx, R. On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 4:01 PM Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Robert, > > > > > > *From: *Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Robert Raszuk < > [email protected]> > *Date: *Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 4:59 AM > *To: *Aijun Wang <[email protected]> > *Cc: *lsr <[email protected]>, Tony Li <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for > draft-li-lsr-liveness-00.txt > > > > [WAJ] The exact description should be “It proposes to use IGP establishing > the out of band channel to deliver the PUB/SUB information” > > > > Sorry - no. You seem to be locking IGPs to flooding based transport only. > Anything else you call "out of band" - I do not subscribe to this. > > > > The IGP is used solely to advertise support for the > registration/notification protocol which operates over TCP or QUIC. I’d > consider this out-of-band signaling with respect to the IGP as well. I will > comment on the draft at a later time as I have some more exigent matters to > attend to. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > > Many thx, > > R. >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
