Searching the draft there are actually a lot of “Strict-Mode for BFD” w/o
“OSPF” preceding it.
I agree w Acee’s suggestion – always use “OSPF BFD Strict-Mode”.
Les
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem (acee)
Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:57 AM
To: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com>
Cc: lsr@ietf.org; draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org; Acee Lindem
(acee) <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04
Hi Ketan,
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 12:41 PM
To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)"
<acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>,
"lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>,
"draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>"
<draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04
Hi Acee,
I do not remember the persons (it was more than one) who provided this comment.
We will make the following changes (unless there are any objections):
s/ OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD/ OSPF BFD Strict-Mode
s/ Strict-Mode for BFD / BFD Strict-Mode
similar ...
I wouldn’t think there would be many of the latter. Perhaps, you could always
use “OSPF BFD Strict-Mode” to avoid any confusion.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 10:13 PM Acee Lindem (acee)
<a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Hi Ketan,
Do you remember who this comment came from? I definitely think anyone who
reads the abstract of the draft wouldn’t be confused and don’t agree with the
comment.
Also, this is meant to be a per-interface sub-option of the existing BFD
configuration – right? There is at least one place that would lead one to
believe it is pre-node.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.i...@gmail.com<mailto:ketant.i...@gmail.com>>
Date: Thursday, February 3, 2022 at 10:31 AM
To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)"
<acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>,
"lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>,
"draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>"
<draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04
Hi Acee,
The authors had picked the term "OSPF BFD Strict-Mode" originally - please
refer to
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ketant-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-01.
However, post IETF presentation, we got feedback from WG members that the term
was misleading and gave an impression that the proposal was introducing a
"strict-mode" in BFD. What we are doing is introducing a "strict-mode" of
operation in OSPF for BFD usage.
We are open to any suggestions for change/clarity.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 2:07 AM Acee Lindem (acee)
<a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>> wrote:
Speaking as Document Shepherd:
I have some editorial comments that I will pass on to the authors offline. One
change I didn’t suggest since it was a big change was from “Strict-Mode for
BFD” to simply “BFD Strict-Mode”. What are your thoughts on this?
We’ve had some good discussion and an updated version is coming with some
updates based on that discussion. Remember that we don’t necessarily have to
incorporate every suggested change but simply need to conclude the discussion.
Thanks,
Acee
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)"
<acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Friday, January 28, 2022 at 7:24 AM
To: Acee Lindem <a...@cisco.com<mailto:a...@cisco.com>>,
"lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Cc:
"draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>"
<draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04
Speaking as WG member:
I support publication of the document. As indicated by the Albert Fu, it has
been implemented by two vendors. I will provide WG Last Call comments when I
prepare the Shepherd’s report.
Thanks,
Acee
From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of
"Acee Lindem (acee)"
<acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Thursday, January 27, 2022 at 12:09 PM
To: "lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>" <lsr@ietf.org<mailto:lsr@ietf.org>>
Cc:
"draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>"
<draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-m...@ietf.org>>
Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Last Call for "OSPF Strict-Mode for BFD" -
draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-bfd-strict-mode-04
LSR WG,
This begins a two week last call for the subject draft. Please indicate your
support or objection on this list prior to 12:00 AM UTC on February 11th,
20222. Also, review comments are certainly welcome.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
