If they are new leaf values why not use the correct no-zone variant, what's the harm in doing it right? It has a nice side effect of basically restricting the base spec zone values to no-zone only. :)
Thanks, Chris. [wg member] > On Apr 4, 2022, at 12:30, Acee Lindem (acee) > <acee=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > In the MIB, the base types don't include the zone - > https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4001.txt > > It was very unfortunate that the YANG IP addresses included the zone in the > base types. > > Tom - I think it would be hard to find an author where including the zone was > a conscious decision. > > Thanks, > Acee > > On 4/4/22, 11:55 AM, "tom petch" <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > > From: Acee Lindem (acee) <a...@cisco.com> > Sent: 04 April 2022 15:58 > > Hi Tom, +Juergen, netmod WG, > > I think the question you ought to be asking is whether the base IPv4 and > IPv6 address types should be modified to NOT include the zone and the zone > versions should be added as a separate YANG type. > > The RFC 6991 is under revision now: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis/ > > However, I'm not sure if the painful backward compatibility discussions > could be overcome. We'd also have to admit that it was a big mistake to > include the zone in the base addresses. In any case, I don't think we just > start using the no-zone types when the base addresses types are used > everywhere. > > <tp> > > Well, there are plenty of uses of the no-zone types as well, so some > authors, some YANG doctors, have made the conscious choice to use them. I > cannot do a search just now but I see no-zone in the dhc and I2NSF WG I-Ds, > and there are others. > > Also, some authors want the zone information as part of their leaf. > > Tom Petch > > Thanks, > Acee > > > > On 4/4/22, 7:11 AM, "Lsr on behalf of tom petch" <lsr-boun...@ietf.org on > behalf of ie...@btconnect.com> wrote: > > I assume that this is a refresh while waiting for ospf.yang to wind > its way through the system > > I wonder if the ip address should be the no-zone variant from RFC6991 > - I never know the answer to that so keep asking. > > Some time the contact needs updating to https://datatracker and the > TLP to 'Revised' > > Tom Petch > > ________________________________________ > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org > <internet-dra...@ietf.org> > Sent: 07 March 2022 03:14 > To: i-d-annou...@ietf.org > Cc: lsr@ietf.org > Subject: [Lsr] I-D Action: > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Link State Routing WG of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Model for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs > Authors : Acee Lindem > Sharmila Palani > Yingzhen Qu > Filename : > draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10.txt > Pages : 29 > Date : 2022-03-06 > > Abstract: > This document defines a YANG data model augmenting the IETF OSPF > YANG > model to provide support for OSPFv3 Link State Advertisement (LSA) > Extensibility as defined in RFC 8362. OSPFv3 Extended LSAs provide > extensible TLV-based LSAs for the base LSA types defined in RFC > 5340. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang/ > > There is also an htmlized version available at: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-extended-lsa-yang-10 > > > Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at > rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
