Hi - Let me get this straight. WG A standardized types X and Y years ago, and support for these has presumably been implemented in some number of tools, which in turn have been used to develop some unknowable number of products, whose deployment is even more unknowable.
WG B comes along, and wants to use X, but dislikes the name, preferring to call it Y instead. WG B then demands that A rename X to Y, with no regard to the process for managing changes to types nor to the collateral damage resulting from the changed definition of Y. That we should even be bothering with this discussion is the kind of thing that gives standards organizations a bad name. Randy _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
