Hi Sue,
Sorry for the late response. Thanks very much for your reminding. We co-authors 
are updating the draft and will refresh it soon.
We will try to move it to WGLC in the IETF114. For the issue of moving BGP-LS 
without OSPFv3, I am not experienced enough to reply. Wish to learn the ADs and 
other's suggestion.


Best Regards,
Robin




________________________________



李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745/+968-91797068
Email: [email protected]

发件人:Susan Hares <[email protected]>
收件人:lsr <[email protected]>
抄 送:draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions 
<[email protected]>
时 间:2022-06-07 08:31:09
主 题:[Lsr] Status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospv3-srv6-extensions

What is the status of draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions?  Is this draft 
ready for WG LC?  Do you anticipate WG LC soon?

This draft expired on 5/23/2022. It has not be updated since 5/23.   Is this 
just an oversight for the authors?

draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-09 references 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions, and cannot go forward until the status 
of this draft is resolved.

Should IDR move draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-09.txt forward without 
draft-ietf-lsr-ospfv3-srv6-extensions?

Sue Hares
IDR Shepherd and chair
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to