Tom - > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 2:52 AM > To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis-00 > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Christian Hopps > <[email protected]> > Sent: 07 December 2022 13:20 > To: [email protected] > > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Dec 21, 2022, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ > > <tp> > Clicking on the URL in Section 15 of the HTML-formatted I-D pulls up a list of > 8642 messages; this may be a quirk of my user-friendly browsers although it > does happen with all of them which suggests not. > [LES:] I'll look into fixing this in the next revision. Thanx.
> The I-D might benefit from a Terminology section. SABM, for example, is a > well-known abbreviation in link layer protocols but not in the sense it is > used > here. > [LES:] The first use of SABM (in Section 5 TLV ASCII art) is followed by: "SABM Length: Standard Application Identifier Bit Mask Length in octets." Do you really think this is not sufficient? > The IANA registry has 28 references to RFC8920; should this be updated? [LES:] The IANA section states: "This specification updates two existing registries:..." Based on this instruction, I assume the IANA folks will update the existing references to the new RFC. Les > > Tom Petch > > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. > > Thanks, > Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
