From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> Sent: 08 December 2022 15:38
Tom - > -----Original Message----- > From: tom petch <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2022 2:52 AM > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> on behalf of Christian Hopps > <[email protected]> > Sent: 07 December 2022 13:20 > This begins a 2 week WG Last Call, ending Dec 21, 2022, for: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-rfc8920bis/ > > <tp> > Clicking on the URL in Section 15 of the HTML-formatted I-D pulls up a list of > 8642 messages; this may be a quirk of my user-friendly browsers although it > does happen with all of them which suggests not. [LES:] I'll look into fixing this in the next revision. Thanx. > The I-D might benefit from a Terminology section. SABM, for example, is a > well-known abbreviation in link layer protocols but not in the sense it is > used > here. > [LES:] The first use of SABM (in Section 5 TLV ASCII art) is followed by: "SABM Length: Standard Application Identifier Bit Mask Length in octets." Do you really think this is not sufficient? <tp> yes, I really think that it is not sufficient. It is a very dense I-D as the lists in s.5 and s.6 show so I think that a terminology section would help. I was working with SABM for decades before OSPF repurposed that abbreviation; others might stumble with e.g LFA or SR although those I do not. > The IANA registry has 28 references to RFC8920; should this be updated? [LES:] The IANA section states: "This specification updates two existing registries:..." Based on this instruction, I assume the IANA folks will update the existing references to the new RFC. <tp> I never have a problem with giving IANA precise instructions. They are very good at doing what they are told (even when it is not sensible!). Here you are asking them to look beyond the IANA Considerations, note that the references on the website are to an RFC that is being obsoleted and infer the action needed. Tell them! Tom Petch Les > > Tom Petch > > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. > > Thanks, > Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
