Our bad then. I’m all for experimental given it reflects the status better.
Next version will have all the Les’s observations in. It was in fact an excellent discussion/observations he put out on the list … * Tony From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, 3 January 2023 at 12:08 To: Antoni Przygienda <[email protected]> Cc: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]>, Russ White ([email protected]) <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Optimal Distributed Flooding for Dense Topologies" - draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03 [External Email. Be cautious of content] Speaking as Document Shepherd and WG Co-Chair: Hi Tony, I agree that it should be “Experimental”. However, it is currently “Informational”. https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-lsr-distoptflood/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHnlsVcRA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-lsr-distoptflood/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHnlsVcRA$> If the authors agree, let’s change it with WG adoption. Thanks, Acee > On Jan 3, 2023, at 4:49 AM, Antoni Przygienda > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Informational? That is weird. If this is not an “experiment” then I don’t > know what is … > > • Tony > From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, 2 January 2023 at 22:04 > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, Antoni Przygienda <[email protected]>, > Shraddha Hegde <[email protected]>, Russ White ([email protected]) <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Optimal Distributed Flooding for > Dense Topologies" - draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03 > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > Authors, > The working group adoption call has completed and we will adopt the subject > document as an informational document. We can continue to discuss whether it > is experimental or informational. Please republish as > draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood-00. There was one substantive discussion with > Les Ginsberg and I believe updates were discussed. Please continue this > discussion with the working group version of the document. > Thanks, > Acee > From: Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> > Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2022 at 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] <[email protected]> > Subject: WG Adoption Call for "IS-IS Optimal Distributed Flooding for Dense > Topologies" - draft-white-lsr-distoptflood-03 > LSR WG, > This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-lsr-distoptflood/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHnlsVcRA$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-white-lsr-distoptflood/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHnlsVcRA$> > The draft would be adopted on the Informational or Experimental track. > Please indicate your support or objection by December 7th, 2022. > Also indicate whether you believe it should be Informational or Experimental > track. > Thanks, > Acee > > Juniper Business Use Only > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHc_0Xcyg$<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!CIUGqD6jk_O5EH2YaQJEzVXZdgLSTsCC-Y8vIBe34q4uQr3L9khl28NGk_KnW_-wKDc3updHc_0Xcyg$> Juniper Business Use Only
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
