Hi Chris, > On Feb 13, 2023, at 2:56 PM, Chris Parker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > First time poster here. Sincere apologies if I make any mistakes in > etiquette. I work at Juniper, and am mailing on suggestion of Shraddha Hegde, > after a conversation about draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo. > > Having read the draft, I think I've found two tiny things to fix. > > The first is a typo: In the text "The following values area allocated by IANA > from this registry for Flex-Algorithms", I think it should say "are", not > "area”.
This is definitely a typo. > > The second is a point of clarification in the text "The IS-IS FAD Sub-TLV has > an area scope". I think perhaps this should be "level scope", not "area > scope". I can’t seem to find similar IS-IS terminology. I’ll defer to the authors. However, you’d be correct for OSPF. > > For example, imagine a level 2 backbone that contains four areas. I would > imagine the intended behavior is actually to flood this sub-TLV through the > entire level 2 backbone, rather than just to the other routers in the > particular area that the originator happens to reside in? > > Hopefully these are useful changes. Apologies once again if I've made any > errors in this process. Speaking as WG Co-Chair - This is definitely the right process and we look forward to your future reviews of LSR documents!!! Thanks, Acee > > Best regards > Chris Parker > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
