Acee - From: Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2023 10:33 AM To: Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flood...@ietf.org Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for "IS-IS Fast Flooding" - draft-ietf-lsr-isis-fast-flooding-04
I support publication. I’ve done the shepherds review and have some editorial comments that I think will improve the readability (attached). Some of these are definitely subjective and optional. Others are obvious editorial comments (e.g., correction of minimumLSPTransmission-Interval to not have a hyphen). I also have the following comments: 1. In section 6.2.2.1, does the sending rate really increases as the Round Trip Time (RTT) increases? This is counter-intuitive. It seems to me that the rate would increase as the RTT decreases? 2. I notice you use “:=“ for assignment in the algorithm descriptions. Is there a convention for this rather than just using “=“? Reminds me of ALGOL-68 ;^) [LES:] I will let Bruno/Guillaume address the above 3. The algorithms in section 6 are non-normative, yet there is some normative language, e.g., MUST. Either the algorithm sub-sections need to clearly delineated or if all of section 6 is non-normative, lowercase must be used. [LES:] You want lower case – or do you want SHOULD ? There are instances of upper case SHOULD – but you did not comment on them. ?? Les Thanks, Acee > On Jul 19, 2023, at 7:06 PM, Acee Lindem > <acee.i...@gmail.com<mailto:acee.i...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > This begins three week LSR Working Group last call for the “IS-IS Fast > Flooding”. Please express your support or objection prior to Friday, August > 11th, 2023. The longer WG last call is to account for the IETF being next > week. > > Thanks, > Acee
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
