I support the adoption of the document. I have below comments
1. It is not clear whether " OSPFv2 Prefix Attributes Sub-TLV" and "OSPFv3 Prefix Attributes Sub-TLV" Would allow other sub-tlvs under them in future. If so, the flags should be a separate sub-sub-TLV under Prefix attributes sub-TLV. If it does not allow other attributes, pls rename it as " OSPFv2 Prefix flags Sub-TLV" 2. section 3 has below statement " This document does not define any flags." For OSPFv3 this document defines 2 new bits. This text needs to be updated and IANA section Needs to be updated. Rgds Shraddha Juniper Business Use Only -----Original Message----- From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:27 PM To: Lsr <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03 [External Email. Be cautious of content] LSR WG, This starts the Working Group adoption call for draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. Please send your support or objection to this list before December 2nd, 2023. The extra week is to allow for the US Thanksgiving holiday. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DGBre12MrjIxWhX5kt5kFUqEsrj_psPbViIAnrBl4i9-7wff2Fyrg5EIgKXtJdujJ3xKN4aYAomnS4NXOHM$ _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
