Hi Shraddha,
On 22/11/2023 12:58, Shraddha Hegde wrote:
I support the adoption of the document.
I have below comments
1. It is not clear whether " OSPFv2 Prefix Attributes Sub-TLV" and "OSPFv3 Prefix
Attributes Sub-TLV"
Would allow other sub-tlvs under them in future. If so, the flags should be a separate
sub-sub-TLV under Prefix attributes sub-TLV. If it does not allow other attributes, pls
rename it as " OSPFv2 Prefix flags Sub-TLV"
no sub0sub-TLVs, the value portion is just a bitstring like ISIS
IPv4/IPv6 Extended Reachability Attribute Flags (rfc7794).
2. section 3 has below statement
" This document does not define any flags."
For OSPFv3 this document defines 2 new bits. This text needs to be updated and
IANA section
U/UP-flags have been moved here by mistake, they are defined in the UPA
dratf. Will be fixed.
thanks,
Peter
Needs to be updated.
Rgds
Shraddha
Juniper Business Use Only
-----Original Message-----
From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2023 9:27 PM
To: Lsr <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for "Prefix Flag Extension for OSPFv2 and
OSPFv3" - draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
LSR WG,
This starts the Working Group adoption call for
draft-chen-lsr-prefix-extended-flags-03. Please send your support or objection
to this list before December 2nd, 2023. The extra week is to allow for the US
Thanksgiving holiday.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!DGBre12MrjIxWhX5kt5kFUqEsrj_psPbViIAnrBl4i9-7wff2Fyrg5EIgKXtJdujJ3xKN4aYAomnS4NXOHM$
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
