John -
The meaningful bits of the SID and the size (number of octets) depend upon the flags. As Section 2.1.1.1 states (emphasis added): The following settings for V-Flag and L-Flag are valid: The V-Flag and L-Flag are set to 0: The SID/Index/Label field is a 4-octet index defining the offset in the SID/Label space advertised by this router using the encodings defined in Section 3.1. The V-Flag and L-Flag are set to 1: The SID/Index/Label field is a 3-octet local label where the 20 rightmost bits are used for encoding the label value. Do you still believe some change/clarification is needed? Les > -----Original Message----- > From: John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> > Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 1:13 PM > To: stefano.prev...@gmail.com; Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > <ginsb...@cisco.com>; Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil) <cfils...@cisco.com>; > abashandy.i...@gmail.com; han...@rtbrick.com; DECRAENE Bruno > INNOV/NET <bruno.decra...@orange.com>; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; Jeff > Tantsura <jefftant.i...@gmail.com>; Peter Psenak (ppsenak) > <ppse...@cisco.com>; Horneffer, Martin <martin.hornef...@telekom.de>; > wim.henderi...@nokia.com; edc.i...@gmail.com; ro...@google.com; > milojevici...@gmail.com; s...@ytti.fi > Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> > Subject: Bug in RFC 8667 definition of SID/Index/Label > > Hi Authors and Contributors who "should be considered as coauthors”, > > Your RFC defines the SID/Index/Label field of the Prefix Segment Identifier > (Prefix-SID) Sub-TLV, in Section 2.1, as: > > SID/Index/Label as defined in Section 2.1.1.1. > > But when I look at Section 2.1.1.1 I see that it defines "V-Flag and L-Flag”, > not > SID/Index/Label at all. It relates to the interpretation of SID/Index/Label, > yes, > but it doesn’t define the field. > > It seems as though an erratum is needed to provide a useful definition. I > don’t > have text to suggest. Can one of you suggest text, and either raise the > erratum > yourself, or if you send text, I can raise it? Alternatively, if you can help > me > understand how section 2.1.1.1 actually does define this field, I'm all ears. > > Thanks, > > --John
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr