Hi Les, Ack - we will fix that text.
Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:17 AM Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> wrote: > I support adoption of this draft. > Knowledge of whether a given prefix is Anycast has proven useful in > existing deployments - closing this gap for OSPFv2 is a good thing to do. > > One editorial comment. The introduction (and abstract) states: > > " Both SR-MPLS prefix-SID and IPv4 prefix may be configured as anycast > and as such the same value can be advertised by multiple routers." > > But there is no further discussion of prefix-SID in the draft. > I think mention of the prefix-SID should be removed. > > Les > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Acee Lindem > > Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2024 11:43 AM > > To: lsr <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: [Lsr] Working Group Adoption Poll for "Updates to Anycast > Property > > advertisement for OSPFv2" - draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag-06 > > > > > > This starts the Working Group adoption call for > draft-chen-lsr-anycast-flag. > > This is a simple OSPFv2 maintenance draft adding an Anycast flag for IPv4 > > prefixes to align with IS-IS and OSPFv3. > > > > Please send your support or objection to this list before April 6th, 2024
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
