Hi John, That might work, given that the content of the section also reflects the intention clearly and matches with the section title change. I can have a look if there is any proposed changes.
//Zahed On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:00 PM John Scudder <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Les, > > On Apr 5, 2024, at 12:17 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > John – I am not entirely clear on what would address your comment. Would > replacing “algorithm” with “approach” in Section 6.3.2 be satisfactory? > > > I think so, with the exception of “there is no requirement or intent to > standardize an algorithm” which would remain as written. But this is > really Zahed’s question to answer. Zahed?, does s/algorithm/approach/g in > Section 6.3.2 (including section title) work for you, or do you have > another suggestion? > > Thanks, > > —John >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
