Thanks, Zahed. Les and all, for clarity: please propose a revision, and then Zahed will take a look at it and sign off or raise any remaining concerns.
—John On Apr 5, 2024, at 9:15 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <[email protected]> wrote: Hi John, That might work, given that the content of the section also reflects the intention clearly and matches with the section title change. I can have a look if there is any proposed changes. //Zahed On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 3:00 PM John Scudder <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Les, On Apr 5, 2024, at 12:17 AM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: John – I am not entirely clear on what would address your comment. Would replacing “algorithm” with “approach” in Section 6.3.2 be satisfactory? I think so, with the exception of “there is no requirement or intent to standardize an algorithm” which would remain as written. But this is really Zahed’s question to answer. Zahed?, does s/algorithm/approach/g in Section 6.3.2 (including section title) work for you, or do you have another suggestion? Thanks, —John
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
