[as wg-member]
Any reason not to use Expert Review? FWIW, this is the only registry for IS-IS
that doesn't.
Thanks,
Chris.
Tony Li <[email protected]> writes:
Hi folks,
This is a proposal to change the registration procedure on the IS-IS
Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry.
It’s currently “Standards Action”. I’m proposing that we change it
to “IETF Review”.
Thanks,
T
Begin forwarded message:
From: [email protected]
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt
Date: April 19, 2024 at 10:39:21 AM PDT
To: "Tony Li" <[email protected]>
A new version of Internet-Draft
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt has been
successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-li-lsr-labv-registration
Revision: 00
Title: Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor
Link-Attribute Bit Values
Date: 2024-04-18
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 2
URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt
Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration/
HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/
draft-li-lsr-labv-registration
Abstract:
RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV",
defines a
registry for "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". This
document changes the registration procedure for that registry
from
"Standards Action" to "IETF Review".
The IETF Secretariat
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
