Hi Tony and Les, Thanks for the reminder and challenge. To get the whole process done in three months is really challenging, especially considering we can't control everything.
But first thing first, I'll start the adoption call. Thanks, Yingzhen On Wed, May 1, 2024 at 10:22 AM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear LSR chairs, > > It’s been a week and you haven’t even given Les a polite response. Will > you take up this challenge? > > Could we please start a WG adoption call? > > Tony > > > > On Apr 23, 2024, at 4:21 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg= > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > I support the proposed change as modified by Chris's comment that the > target should be to use Expert Review. > > In this way all IS-IS codepoint registries would be handled in a > consistent manner and all would allow any class of RFC - including > Experimental - to obtain a code point when appropriate. > > > > In addition, I would like to put out a challenge to our wonderful team > of WG chairs, AD, and even the IESG review process: Let's see if we can get > this whole process done in three months: > > > > 1 month to adopt > > 1 month to last call > > 1 month to complete IESG review > > > > This is a non-controversial administrative change - I see no reason why > this process need take longer than that. > > > > Tony - friendly suggestion to trigger momentum - update the draft based > on Chris's suggestion and ask for WG adoption. > > > > Les > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Lsr <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tony Li > >> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2024 8:54 AM > >> To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]> > >> Cc: lsr <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for > draft-li-lsr-labv-registration- > >> 00.txt > >> > >> > >> Fair point. I can live with that. > >> > >> T > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 20, 2024, at 12:20 AM, Christian Hopps <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> [as wg-member] > >>> > >>> Any reason not to use Expert Review? FWIW, this is the only registry > for IS-IS > >> that doesn't. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Chris. > >>> > >>> Tony Li <[email protected]> writes: > >>> > >>>> Hi folks, > >>>> > >>>> This is a proposal to change the registration procedure on the IS-IS > >>>> Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry. > >>>> > >>>> It’s currently “Standards Action”. I’m proposing that we change it > >>>> to “IETF Review”. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> T > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Begin forwarded message: > >>>> > >>>> From: [email protected] > >>>> Subject: New Version Notification for > >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt > >>>> Date: April 19, 2024 at 10:39:21 AM PDT > >>>> To: "Tony Li" <[email protected]> > >>>> > >>>> A new version of Internet-Draft > >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt has been > >>>> successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > >>>> IETF repository. > >>>> > >>>> Name: draft-li-lsr-labv-registration > >>>> Revision: 00 > >>>> Title: Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor > >>>> Link-Attribute Bit Values > >>>> Date: 2024-04-18 > >>>> Group: Individual Submission > >>>> Pages: 2 > >>>> URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/ > >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt > >>>> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ > >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration/ > >>>> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ > >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Abstract: > >>>> > >>>> RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", > >>>> defines a > >>>> registry for "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". This > >>>> document changes the registration procedure for that registry > >>>> from > >>>> "Standards Action" to "IETF Review". > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> The IETF Secretariat > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>> Lsr mailing list > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> Lsr mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Lsr mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
