Sue, Glad you’re doing better. I’ve submitted this change as -02. Thank you!
See you in Vancouver! T > On Jul 8, 2024, at 11:52 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tony: > > This change is wonderful. Thank you for your patience regarding my response. > > Sue > > From: Tony Li <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Tony Li > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 11:06 AM > To: Susan Hares <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; > [email protected]; lsr <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-01 > > > > > > On Jun 26, 2024, at 4:51 AM, Susan Hares via Datatracker <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Susan Hares > > Review result: Has Nits > > > > Type of review: OPS-DIR > > Editorial comments: none > > > > Process comments: Normally, it is useful to give some advice to the > > designated > > experts for the specific registry. RFC5029 gives sufficient advice, but the > > document does not point backward tward RFC5029. > > > > The designated experts listed for the registry will know the right thing to > > do. > > However, in the future this registry might have different designated > > experts. > > > Hi Sue, > > Thank you for your comment. I would like to propose the following change: > > OLD > > General guidance > for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370]. > > NEW > > General guidance > for the designated experts is defined in [RFC7370] and more specific > guidance can be found in [RFC5029]. > > > Would this address your concern? > > Thanks, > Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
