Speaking as LSR WG chair: > On Aug 7, 2024, at 15:30, Paul Wouters via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration-03: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-labv-registration/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > "In practice, this registration procedure is unnecessarily restrictive, as > it prevents > allocation of bits to experimental protocols, which in turn increases the > risk of conflicts introduced by use of unregistered code points (so-called > "code point squatting") > > Why not create a few "Private use and/or Experimental" values and leave the > registration policy Standards Track?
Because the WG decided to change the allocation policy to “Expert Review”. To subscribe to the LSR mailing list: https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/[email protected]/ Thanks, Acee > > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
