On Aug 7, 2024, at 17:37, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Speaking as LSR WG chair:
>>>
>>> Why not create a few "Private use and/or Experimental" values and leave the
>>> registration policy Standards Track?
>>
>> Because the WG decided to change the allocation policy to “Expert Review”.
This in itself is not an answer. This is true for everything in every WG draft
the IESG has to read.
But the authors clarified this was to bring it in sync with all the other
related registries, so thanks to the authors for taking the time to answer my
question.
>> To subscribe to the LSR mailing list:
>> https://mailman3.ietf.org/mailman3/lists/[email protected]/
Thanks for the pointer but obviously, i cannot subscribe and read all mailing
lists for which i receive drafts to ballot on. It would have been great if the
motivation for the registry policy change had been noted in the Sheperds Write
Up. That's exactly the point of those.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
