Hi, Chris: Please give the proof where is the WG's consensus? We all can see and retrieve all the responses from its WGLC process publicly. Please note: The chairs' preference doesn’t represent the WG's consensus.
Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom -----邮件原件----- 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Christian Hopps 发送时间: 2024年9月3日 11:18 收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]> 抄送: [email protected]; 'Yingzhen Qu' <[email protected]>; 'lsr-chairs' <[email protected]>; 'lsr' <[email protected]> 主题: [Lsr] Re: 【Please Abandon this WGLC document】答复: Re: WG Last Call for draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv (7/1/2024 - 7/15/2024) "Aijun Wang" <[email protected]> writes: > I would like to emphasize that this document will lead to more chaos > for the operators network, even it solves the control of when to send > the MP-TLV problems. > > Please see: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ > Gf4D3REVNXWO9BlIVPqnZ3f-GcM/ for more unsolved problems. > > > > It’s time to ABANDON it. As WG Chair. This document will NOT be abandoned. We're literally in WGLC with WG consensus on the general solution. Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
