Hi Aijun, Please see the IETF procedures for determining rough consensus. We do not need unanimity.
AFAICT, this draft is currently opposed only by you and Bruno and supported by many others. You’re welcome to look at the proof yourself, it’s quite obvious. Please also review RFC 7154 while you’re at it. Regards, Tony > On Sep 2, 2024, at 8:38 PM, Aijun Wang - wangaijun at tsinghua.org.cn > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, Chris: > > Please give the proof where is the WG's consensus? We all can see and > retrieve all the responses from its WGLC process publicly. > Please note: The chairs' preference doesn’t represent the WG's consensus. > > Best Regards > > Aijun Wang > China Telecom > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 > Christian Hopps > 发送时间: 2024年9月3日 11:18 > 收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]> > 抄送: [email protected]; 'Yingzhen Qu' <[email protected]>; > 'lsr-chairs' <[email protected]>; 'lsr' <[email protected]> > 主题: [Lsr] Re: 【Please Abandon this WGLC document】答复: Re: WG Last Call for > draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv (7/1/2024 - 7/15/2024) > > > "Aijun Wang" <[email protected]> writes: > >> I would like to emphasize that this document will lead to more chaos >> for the operators network, even it solves the control of when to send >> the MP-TLV problems. >> >> Please see: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/ >> Gf4D3REVNXWO9BlIVPqnZ3f-GcM/ for more unsolved problems. >> >> >> >> It’s time to ABANDON it. > > As WG Chair. > > This document will NOT be abandoned. We're literally in WGLC with WG > consensus on the general solution. > > Chris. > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
