Hi Bruno,
 
> I also want correctness and I’m fine with your definition of MUST.
> The issue with current text in -05 is that everyone can do MUST and MUST NOT 
> and things may not work. e.g., one node is allowed to send MP-TLV for TLV 22 
> whatever is configured by the network operator.  If other nodes do not 
> support MP-TLV for TLV 22, things will not work.
> How do you propose to make this work?

Please see section 7.  It is both necessary and sufficient.

T


_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to