As an operator of a large IS-IS network. I do support the discussion and development of a leaderless option.
Cheers, -Mohan On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 9:42 AM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > > During the IETF 121 LSR meeting, we had a very good discussion of > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-distoptflood/ > > While the CDS flooding reduction algorithm itself was interesting, the main > area of the discussion was distributed flooding reduction algorithm selection > and its configuration and deployment. > > Today, we have RFC 9667 “Dynamic Flooding on Dense Graphs” which provides > leader-based supporting both centralized and distributed flooding reduction > algorithm selection. With the mechanism, an area leader is selected from > among the OSPF routers in the area supporting flooding reduction and this > leader selects the flooding reduction algorithm for the area. > > The question to be answered by this consensus call is whether or not we want > to work on an additional mechanism just for distributed flooding reduction to > allow for reduced configuration, minimal blast radius, and ease of > incremental deployment. > > Please send your support or opposition to this list before Tuesday, December > 3rd. > > As WG Co-Chair, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
