All, Note that the draft does have an IPR declaration.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity Thanks, Acee > On Jan 17, 2025, at 04:58, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Acee, > > IPR was disclosed earlier before the draft became a WG document: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5989/ > > When we published the WG version of the draft, looks like it was not copied > over. Can this be fixed now? > > thanks, > Peter > > > > On 16/01/2025 19:51, Acee Lindem wrote: >> Co-Authors, >> >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to >> draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03? >> >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see >> RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). >> >> There currently no IPR statements - >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity >> >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond >> to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any >> relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing >> list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a >> response has been received from each author and contributor. >> >> If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or >> contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of >> any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
