Thanks Acee for fixing the problem.
I'm not aware of any other IPR related ti this draft.
thanks,
Peter
On 17/01/2025 13:40, Acee Lindem wrote:
Hi Peter,
I updated the “Replaces” for the draft and now the existing IPR is referenced.
Normally, this happens automatically - perhaps the problem was that I didn’t
update states for the ppsenak version during the WG adoption.
Jakub, Amit,
You also need to respond explicitly to the IPR poll.
Thanks,
Acee
On Jan 17, 2025, at 04:58, Peter Psenak <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Acee,
IPR was disclosed earlier before the draft became a WG document:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/5989/
When we published the WG version of the draft, looks like it was not copied
over. Can this be fixed now?
thanks,
Peter
On 16/01/2025 19:51, Acee Lindem wrote:
Co-Authors,
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to
draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-03?
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs
3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).
There currently no IPR statements -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond
to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any
relevant IPR. *The response needs to be sent to the LSR WG mailing
list.* The document will not advance to the next stage until a
response has been received from each author and contributor.
If you are on the LSR WG email list but are not listed as an author or
contributor, then please explicitly respond only if you are aware of
any IPR that has not yet been disclosed in conformance with IETF rules.
Thanks,
Acee
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
