> On Feb 11, 2025, at 8:33 AM, Aijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hi, Acee:
> 
> I can only say we have different viewpoints/considerations for the 
> implementation of protocol and for the operation of the network.
> 
> The implementation of protocol stack is one shot action, but the operation of 
> network is one continuous activities.

You have to make sure all the routers in the domain support the alternate SPF 
and have it CONFIGURED - today, this isn't supported and so far no other than 
yourself thinks this is a good idea. What I'm saying is you just configure 
consistent metrics in the first place and enforcing consistency is easy to 
automate. I hope in 2025 no one is logging into routers and configuring them 
one at a time. 

Furthermore, the asymmetric IGP case for SAV is one of the easiest to solve - 
much easy than trying to modify the base SPF behavior for every router in the 
IGP domain. 

This just a solution looking for a problem.

Acee 


> 
> I would like to hear your proposal of automatic solutions, please do not 
> consider the solution that detect the change of metrics on every link of 
> every router dynamically and notify the operator to step in intermittently.
> 
> Aijun Wang
> China Telecom
> 
>> On Feb 11, 2025, at 19:13, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Again, speaking as WG member:
>> 
>>> On Feb 10, 2025, at 9:34 PM, Aijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi, Acee:
>>> 
>>> Yes, maybe, but it will require a lot of confirmations on all the links of 
>>> all the IGP existing routers. It will be one error prone approach, for the 
>>> existing infrastructure, or for the future deployment.
>> 
>> This would be very easy to automate and not prone to error. Much less so, 
>> than an assuring an alternate SPF algorithm is uniforming implemented and 
>> deployed across the entire IGP routing domain. This just isn't a good idea.
>> 
>> Acee
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> 
>>> Aijun
>>> 
>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 
>>> Acee Lindem
>>> 发送时间: 2025年2月11日 10:06
>>> 收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>
>>> 抄送: [email protected]; lsr <[email protected]>
>>> 主题: [savnet] Re: [Lsr] [BM-SPF: Solve asymmetrical routing within IGP to 
>>> achieve one simple intra-domain SAV solution] New Version Notification for 
>>> draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf-00.txt
>>> 
>>> Speaking as a WG member:
>>> 
>>> Since an IGP domain is under a single administrative control, you can just 
>>> use consistent metrics on your links if this is your intent.
>>> 
>>> Acee
>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 10, 2025, at 20:47, Aijun Wang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, All experts:
>>>> 
>>>> Along the discussions of intra-domain SAV solution, I found the key 
>>>> obstacle was the asymmetrical routing within the IGP domain.
>>>> It reminds me one of my previous thoughts over this issue, then I rewrite 
>>>> the shelved draft, submit it to the LSR WG, and copy to SAVNET WG for 
>>>> further discussions.
>>>> 
>>>> Once the asymmetrical routing issue is solved and deployed within the IGP 
>>>> domain, the solution for the intra-domain SAV will be very simple------the 
>>>> interfaces(route) to the prefixes in the FIB can be used directly as the 
>>>> source interfaces from these prefixes----no complex SPF or other new 
>>>> algorithm necessary again.
>>>> 
>>>> Wish to get more comments or thoughts on this topic. And we are welcome 
>>>> more experts to join us to forward this draft.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> 
>>>> Aijun Wang
>>>> China Telecom
>>>> 
>>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>>> 发件人: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> 发送时间: 2025年2月11日 9:28
>>>> 收件人: Aijun Wang <[email protected]>
>>>> 主题: New Version Notification for 
>>>> draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf-00.txt
>>>> 
>>>> A new version of Internet-Draft 
>>>> draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf-00.txt
>>>> has been successfully submitted by Aijun Wang and posted to the IETF 
>>>> repository.
>>>> 
>>>> Name:     draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf
>>>> Revision: 00
>>>> Title:    Bidirectional Metric based Shortest Path First Mechanism
>>>> Date:     2025-02-11
>>>> Group:    Individual Submission
>>>> Pages:    8
>>>> URL:      
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf-00.txt
>>>> Status:   
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf/
>>>> HTMLized: 
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-wang-lsr-bidirectional-metric-spf
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Abstract:
>>>> 
>>>> This document describes the mechanism that can be used to accomplish
>>>> the Shortest Path First(SPF) calculation within network based on the
>>>> bidirectional metrics of the links.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The IETF Secretariat
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> 
>>> --
>>> savnet mailing list -- [email protected]
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to