Hi Les, Anyone who claims that the protocol (not just this document) is > underspecified in this regard is ignoring (or unaware of) successful use of > the protocol for the past 25 years. >
You are bringing a very interesting observation to the table. With that I recommend to look a bit broader and count how many robust, scalable and production grade open source implementations have we seen of ISIS when comparing with the very same of BGP. I will let the reader guess why it looks as it looks .... why it is so much easier to take few BGP RFCs and implement at least some essential parts of protocol with required address families in a deployable way. Cheers, Robert
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
