Hi Robert, > With that I recommend to look a bit broader and count how many robust, > scalable and production grade open source implementations have we seen of > ISIS when comparing with the very same of BGP. > > I will let the reader guess why it looks as it looks .... why it is so much > easier to take few BGP RFCs and implement at least some essential parts of > protocol with required address families in a deployable way.
Let’s not let the reader guess. IS-IS is less popular than BGP. This should not be news. IS-IS has competition in the IGP space. BGP has no competition. Show me the complaints from the open-source IS-IS implementors who cannot figure out the spec. Based on that empty set, I don’t think that there’s an issue. Regards, T _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
