Hi Behcet, > On Feb 12, 2026, at 1:34 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:21 PM Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker > <[email protected]> wrote: > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity > Title: Advertising Unreachable Links in OSPF > Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call comments. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity-?? > Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya > Review Date: 2026-02-12 > IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-12 > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > Summary: This draft defines some extensions to OSPF on the > MaxReachableLinkMetric and the "Unreachable Link support", LSLinkInfinity and > MaxLinkMetric when calculating the default SPF. > > Major issues: > > Minor issues: > > Nits/editorial comments: > The draft has 14 occurrences of RFC XXXX to refer to itself, > it should be changed to "this document"
The RFC editor has never had a problem with this notation in the past. > > Many parts of the draft are impossible to understand, including the abstract. > So writing should be improved. I've re-written the abstract in -18. If you have other editorial suggestion that would make it possible for you to understand, feel free. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
