Hi Acee,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2026 at 1:17 PM Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Behcet, > > > On Feb 12, 2026, at 1:34 PM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2026 at 12:21 PM Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity > > Title: Advertising Unreachable Links in OSPF > > Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya > > Review result: Ready with Issues > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > like any other last call comments. > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. > > > > Document: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-ls-link-infinity-?? > > Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya > > Review Date: 2026-02-12 > > IETF LC End Date: 2026-02-12 > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > Summary: This draft defines some extensions to OSPF on the > MaxReachableLinkMetric and the "Unreachable Link support", LSLinkInfinity > and MaxLinkMetric when calculating the default SPF. > > > > Major issues: > > > > Minor issues: > > > > Nits/editorial comments: > > The draft has 14 occurrences of RFC XXXX to refer to itself, > > it should be changed to "this document" > > The RFC editor has never had a problem with this notation in the past. > > > > > > Many parts of the draft are impossible to understand, including the > abstract. So writing should be improved. > > I've re-written the abstract in -18. If you have other editorial > suggestion that would make it possible for you to understand, feel free. > > I read it and it looks good. Thx, Behcet > Thanks, > Acee > >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
