Minutes for UA MOPS meeting, May 11, 2006

In attendance:
   Tim Axelrod, Kobus Barnard, Praveen Rao

Main points:

   o Summer meeting time of Tuesday, 10:00, staring May 16, confirmed. 

   o We had a lightly attended, but useful meeting. The usual comments about the
     effectiveness of a meeting is inversely related to the number of attendees
     were made. 

   o We discussed pragmatics for the construction of the SPIE poster. 

   o (Tim) MOU is very close. 

   o Praveen presented a straw proposal for database tables to keep track of
     detections and linkages. 

   o We discussed the separation of data between base-camp and archive in the
     context of the above. While the amount of data is not huge compared with
     the raw images, it seems most convenient to focus the processing at the
     archive center for a number of reasons.

   o Back of the envelope calculation suggests that an order of magnitude for
     the detection data base is 1GB/day.

   o There is an issue of what we call the "Projection Pipeline" in relation to
     the LSST/PanSTARRS collaboration. Praveen has the action item of figuring
     out what (if anything) takes its place in PanSTARRS. 

   o Tim suggested contact between us and Jacek Becla regarding database
     construction. 

-- 
Kobus Barnard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://kobus.ca
730 Gould Simpson, U. Arizona (520-621-4237)
Minutes for UA MOPS meeting, May 11, 2006

In attendance:
   Tim Axelrod, Kobus Barnard, Praveen Rao

Main points:

   o Summer meeting time of Tuesday, 10:00, staring May 16, confirmed. 

   o We had a lightly attended, but useful meeting. The usual comments about the
     effectiveness of a meeting is inversely related to the number of attendees
     were made. 

   o We discussed pragmatics for the construction of the SPIE poster. 

   o (Tim) MOU is very close. 

   o Praveen presented a straw proposal for database tables to keep track of
     detections and linkages. 

   o We discussed the separation of data between base-camp and archive in the
     context of the above. While the amount of data is not huge compared with
     the raw images, it seems most convenient to focus the processing at the
     archive center for a number of reasons.

   o Back of the envelope calculation suggests that an order of magnitude for
     the detection data base is 1GB/day.

   o There is an issue of what we call the "Projection Pipeline" in relation to
     the LSST/PanSTARRS collaboration. Praveen has the action item of figuring
     out what (if anything) takes its place in PanSTARRS. 

   o Tim suggested contact between us and Jacek Becla regarding database
     construction. 

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to