Hi Francesco, Here are a few comments on your parameters:
field size should be 9.6 square degrees I'm not sure what the false detection magnitude means, but LSST is spec'ing a 5 sigma limit for a single exposure of 24.5, so 23.5 is mighty bright. If the astrometric error is meant to be absolute astrometric error, then I think that it should be more like 0.05, which is the design spec for absolute atrometric accuracy. cheers, Kem > > Hi there, > > I am running PS-MOPS on the data that Kem sent us (i.e. three months > of cadence simulator output spanning the period October-December 2006). > > The first test run raised some issues of scalability of the code (out > of memory errors)... Apart from these, I would like to make sure that > what I am running is indeed a sensible simulation. For this I would > need some advice from you guys in properly setting up the > configuration file (in attachment) with LSST specific parameters. > > Another thing worth thinking about is that PS-MOPS does NOT use any > filter information. This means that the pipeline silently assumes > that all fields were observed in the same filter (red) even when that > is clearly not the case. > > Thanks! > Francesco > > > _______________________________________________ > LSST-data mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data > _______________________________________________ LSST-data mailing list [email protected] http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
