> On Feb 28, 2021, at 10:28 PM, 3gg <[email protected]> wrote: > Are any of you particularly acquainted with the health effects/risks of 5g
Yes.
The principal difference between 5g and previous generations of wireless
deployment is that 5g emphasizes microcellular scale. That is, it puts the
radios closer to people, which means that more people can be served, at higher
speed each, because fewer people share the same spectrum. This means that each
cell can (must!) transmit at a much lower wattage, because it’s not trying to
reach as far. Specifically, it’s trying to reach less far, so that another
cell can be put up closer, and a larger pool of users can be divided between
the two cells. So, the cells transmit at lower wattage, but they’re also
closer, so that only benefits the people who are closest to the current cells,
once they’re decommissioned, since they’re the ones who will be absorbing lower
wattage than before.
But cells are far away, and RF energy drops off as the square of the distance,
so cells are really insignificant in all this. What matters is the phone. The
thing you hold up next to your head, when you want to warm up. That’s really
close to you, but really far from the cell. So it needs to transmit at fairly
high wattage to reach the cell at all, and that means a lot of its energy goes
into cooking you, since you’re close and occluding a large portion of its
field-of-view. By bringing the cell closer, the phone’s transmit wattage can
be reduced, giving you a smaller, lighter phone, with a longer-lasting battery
and, perhaps most importantly, it uses far less of the energy in that battery
to cook your head.
So, yes, 5g has substantial health benefits.
-Bill
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
