In your last statement, are you saying the health risk is acceptable because you get to at least use your phone?
Thank you, Marc On 2/28/21 4:32 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Mar 1, 2021, at 1:09 AM, 3gg <[email protected]> wrote: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5376454/ https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/pr208_E.pdf Do you have any concerns with those studies and the results?Nope, they’re just documenting the basic principle upon which microwave ovens operate. And phones. And the sun. Etc.I also don't understand the last part; if RF exposure does have adverse health effects, what exactly is the net win, and for whom?Reducing RF exposure is a net win for anyone who wishes to be exposed to less of it. I wish to be exposed to less RF energy, yet I would like to still be able to use a mobile phone. Therefore, I’m very much in favor of 5g, since it allows me to use a mobile phone which transmits less RF energy into me. This is physics, but it’s pretty elementary. There’s no mystery here. -Bill
-- GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235E https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/
OpenPGP_0x39B850B3CB16235E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
