That was a good read, thank you.In a brief attempt to further educate myself on the matter, I was going to go ahead and read one of the papers linked from that article: "Distinguishing Polemic From Commentary in Science: Some Guidelines Illustrated With the Case of Sage and Burgio (2017)". But when I least expected it, I was greeted with the marvelous price tag of $50. So much for distinguishing polemic from commentary in science.
Have we already lost the fight on opening research paid with my taxpayer money to the public, or are we getting there?
Marc On 3/1/21 11:42 AM, Sam King wrote:
This article has a diagram of where 5g is in the electromagnetic spectrum (along with some of the reasons why the general consensus is that that's safe): https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/16/science/5g-cellphones-wireless-cancer.html>-SamOn Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:34 AM 3gg <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:That makes sense, thank you. What isn't yet very clear to me is the absolute scale of things. Where on that radiation scale would a deployment of 5g lie at, what magnitudes are considered harmful by recent research, and who backed that research? I cannot navigate these papers without getting lost, but hopefully you can share your insights. Thank you, Marc On 2/28/21 4:52 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > >> On Mar 1, 2021, at 1:40 AM, 3gg <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> In your last statement, are you saying the health risk is acceptable because you get to at least use your phone? > No. This isn’t about acceptable or not acceptable. That’s subjective, and different for different people. > > This is just about “more” or “less.” > > -Bill >-- GPG: B214 8642 71D9 D5F2 CB2E D4D4 39B8 50B3 CB16 235Ehttps://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/ <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/>-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any majorcommercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt <https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt>. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
OpenPGP_0x39B850B3CB16235E.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].
