On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 09:28 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Subrata Modak wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 08:35 -0400, Mike Melendez wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > I vote for having simply the output in XML format (plus usual text file > as already confirmed by Subrata). > From XML we can do a lot of things... using a XSL stylesheet to show > result on a web page, > using a XML transformer (C, java, whatever) to generate other output, > importing the log easily > on a spreadsheet and so on. > > Regards, > Carmelo
Thanks Carmelo, Can you also post a sample XML file that you would expect the Parser to generate (from the Text file) (say the XML file contains the highlighting and other features that i mentioned below ) ?? --Subrata-- > > New format can also have some features like: > > 1) Background highlighting for WARNINGS, > > 2) Background highlighting for FAIL, > > 3) Background highlighting for BROK, > > 4) Sorted testcase(s) for FAILED output, > > 5) Serial No.s in which tests were executed, etc > > > > You can also suggest ways that you think can add more value. > > > > --Subrata-- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
