On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | >
> | > CLONE_NEWPID value changed in 2.6.23-rc3-mm2. Update libclone.h to reflect
> | > that change.
> | >
> |
> | Hi, Suka,
> |
> | CLONE_NEWPID is not yet in mainline, once the changes make it to
> | mainline in 2.6.24-rc1 or 2.6.24-rc1-gitXXX we can consider taking
> | this patch into LTP. What do you think?
>
> Well CLONE_NEWPID that is already in LTP is not correct either.
> But yes, waiting for mainline inclusion is fine.
>

Good point! I did not realize that it was already in there. Thanks for
clarifying.

> |
> | Balbir
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to