Thanks Sukadev/Balbir. We will wait for mainline inclusion. --Subrata-- On Thu, 2007-10-11 at 21:27 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > | On 10/11/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > | > > > | > CLONE_NEWPID value changed in 2.6.23-rc3-mm2. Update libclone.h to > > reflect > > | > that change. > > | > > > | > > | Hi, Suka, > > | > > | CLONE_NEWPID is not yet in mainline, once the changes make it to > > | mainline in 2.6.24-rc1 or 2.6.24-rc1-gitXXX we can consider taking > > | this patch into LTP. What do you think? > > > > Well CLONE_NEWPID that is already in LTP is not correct either. > > But yes, waiting for mainline inclusion is fine. > > > > Good point! I did not realize that it was already in there. Thanks for > clarifying. > > > | > > | Balbir > >
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
