On Nov 09, 2007  12:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> So, I think i can include the GPLv2 license without removing your
> license. Will that be OK ?

Yes, that seems fine with me.

> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:12 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Nov 07, 2007  11:37 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote:
> > > I need to include the following GPL definition to the fsx-linux patch
> > > that you submitted to SF.net LTP Patch Tracker on 14-June-2007
> > > (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=303382&aid=1736922&group_id=3382)
> > 
> > The changes CFS made to this program are under GPL v2 license.  The Apple
> > copyright is as we got it from the upstream code (possibly from Andrew
> > Morton's test scripts, I'm not sure).
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers, Andreas
> > 

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to