Thanks Andreas. However i have made changes to the following test cases for want of clear GPLv2 definitions:
testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_01.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_02_ctl.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_02_get.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_02_rcv.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_02_snd.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_04.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/message_queue_test_05.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/pipe_test_01.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/pipe_test_02.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/semaphore_test_01.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/semaphore_test_02.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/semaphore_test_03.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_01.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_02.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_03.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_04.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_05.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_06.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/shmem_test_07.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_01.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_02.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_03.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_04.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_05.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_06.c testcases/kernel/ipc/ipc_stress/signal_test_07.c testcases/kernel/sched/clisrv/pthserv.c testcases/kernel/sched/clisrv/readline.c testcases/kernel/sched/clisrv/writen.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_driver.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched.h testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc0.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc1.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc2.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc3.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc4.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc5.c testcases/kernel/sched/sched_stress/sched_tc6.c --Subrata- On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 16:37 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Nov 09, 2007 12:59 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > So, I think i can include the GPLv2 license without removing your > > license. Will that be OK ? > > Yes, that seems fine with me. > > > On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 14:12 -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > On Nov 07, 2007 11:37 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > I need to include the following GPL definition to the fsx-linux patch > > > > that you submitted to SF.net LTP Patch Tracker on 14-June-2007 > > > > (https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=303382&aid=1736922&group_id=3382) > > > > > > The changes CFS made to this program are under GPL v2 license. The Apple > > > copyright is as we got it from the upstream code (possibly from Andrew > > > Morton's test scripts, I'm not sure). > > > > > > > > > Cheers, Andreas > > > > > Cheers, Andreas > -- > Andreas Dilger > Sr. Software Engineer, Lustre Group > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
