On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:42 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote: > Hi, > Sorry for the late answer. > Here is a patch that include rpc-tirpc test suite into the network/rpc > branch.
Well and that should be great. Give me some time to investigate and review. --Subrata > > Regards, > > Aurélien > > Subrata Modak wrote: > > >On Wed, 2007-12-26 at 12:19 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > > > > >>On Thu, 2007-12-20 at 16:34 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > >> > >> > >>>On Tue, 2007-12-18 at 15:49 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I think the natural place for including these tests is the > >>>>testcases/network/rpc branch. > >>>> > >>>>Do you want me to send a patch from the last ltp realease that includes > >>>>them in the right place ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Yes. That would be great. Please pick up the latest LTP from: > >>>http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp-full-20071130.tgz?download, > >>> > >>> > >>Do you have any updates for me on this ?? > >> > >> > > > >Are you ready with your Patch ? > > > >--Subrata > > > > > >>--Subrata > >> > >> > >>>And i would also like to propose the following points: > >>>1) You should know the way LTP-Network Tests are run. There are some > >>>inherent variables set and other environmental settings done both at the > >>>Client as well as the Server Side before these tests are executed. So, > >>>your patch (new test cases addition for RPC and TRIPC) should be able to > >>>adhere to all those norms. User should be able to execute your test > >>>cases automatically when they run LTP-Network tests, > >>>2) You should also properly document what your test cases are all about, > >>>how they can be built, installed and executed and how their results > >>>should be parsed in a Proper README file in any of the sub-directories > >>>that your patch is going to create under ltp/testcases/network/rpc. > >>>3) Include Copyright and GPLv2 definition at the beginning of each of > >>>your new Test cases for License conformance in LTP, > >>>4) Last and not the least, please respond to somebody if they find > >>>problem(s) in executing your testcases by providing fixes, patches, etc > >>>on the mailing-list. > >>> > >>>Expecting a patch from you on this and much more contribution to LTP in > >>>future. Good luck. > >>> > >>>--Subrata > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Best regards, > >>>>Aurélien > >>>> > >>>>Subrata Modak wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>*********************** > >>>>>Warning: Your file, rpc-test-suite.tar.bz2, contains more than 32 files > >>>>>after decompression and cannot be scanned. > >>>>>*********************** > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Well i am waiting for reply to the proposals that i made below. Is it > >>>>>possible for you to submit a Patch on the lines other Network Tests in > >>>>>general and NFS tests in Particular, that are written in LTP. > >>>>> > >>>>>I would also like to know more about the prospect of including the > >>>>>attached test suite inside LTP from the community. What do you feel > >>>>>about including the same in LTP after some tweaking ?? > >>>>> > >>>>>--Subrata > >>>>> > >>>>>On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 15:11 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 08:51 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped by our NFSv4 > >>>>>>>team. > >>>>>>>I sent a message with code as attachment to the ltp-list, because it > >>>>>>>would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP > >>>>>>>testsuite. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test > >>>>>>>harness API to be included in the project ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Thanks you in advance for advice. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Best regards, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Aurélien > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>I had replied to you earlier on this. May be the mail has not reached > >>>>>>you. I will paste my Reply below to the same mail you sent earlier: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Aurélien Charbon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 11/30/2007 > >>>>>>07:50:02 PM: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Hi, > >>>>>>>A test-suite for RPC linux libraries has been developped in our NFSv4 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>team. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>I sent a message with the code as attachment to the ltp-list, because > >>>>>>>it would be great to see the code integrated and used in the LTP > >>>>>>>testsuite. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>Thank you. I received it long back. Yes it would be great to have any > >>>>>>sort of Value addition to LTP. We welcome you to give us any nonexistent > >>>>>>test cases to LTP. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>Unfortunately I did not get any answer about that code. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>Sorry for that. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>I have a question: does the code have to necessarily use the LTP test > >>>>>>>harness API to be included in the project ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>May not be always. It depends on the type of Test Cases that we are > >>>>>>trying to Integrate to LTP. For example, KDUMP is executed Exclusively > >>>>>>and does not run with runltp script. So it is not a problem if it > >>>>>>reports results in itś own format, but, the same is not with NUMA. So, i > >>>>>>got the NUMA guy to write it in Ltp TEST HARNESS API. So, it depends > >>>>>>upon the type of Integration. I think the Network testcases in LTP does > >>>>>>not follow the LTP API as again Network Test Cases are run separately in > >>>>>>most instances. Having said that, i would like to see your test cases in > >>>>>>the form of some new subdirectory under ltp/testcases/network. There are > >>>>>>already nfs and nfsv4 test cases existing. Please go through them and > >>>>>>see whether the functionality they cover are also covered by your test > >>>>>>cases, then in such a case there will be just the duplication of same > >>>>>>functionality testing. Can you please come up with an idea to find out > >>>>>>the exact place where we can comfortably put your test cases in LTP ?? > >>>>>>And then submit a Patch in this regard. I would be more than happy to > >>>>>>see your test cases in LTP. I am attaching the same once again for > >>>>>>everybody to review. Let us come up with an IDEA to include Charbonś > >>>>>>contribution in LTP. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>--Subrata-- > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>SF.Net email is sponsored by: > >>>Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > >>>It's the best place to buy or sell services > >>>for just about anything Open Source. > >>>http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Ltp-list mailing list > >>>[email protected] > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > >>> > >>> > >>------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > >>Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > >>http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > >>_______________________________________________ > >>Ltp-list mailing list > >>[email protected] > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
