> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 10:30 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I have run the whole test suite after having applied this little patch.
> > There should not be any difference between the original test run and a 
> > run post patch applied since there are no new code in runtest scripts to 
> > launch the new tests for RPC.
> > Do you think it is necessary to add an entry in the scripts ?
> 
> Yes, this is absolutely necessary, else, how do people run your new test
> cases and be sure that it works fine too. It should also be able to run
> (the new test cases) when people invoke ltp/testscripts/networktests.sh.
> 

Hi Aurélien Charbon,

I was expecting some work around for my above comments. You need to make
changes to files:
1) ltp/runtest/rpc, and,
2) ltp/runtest/stress.part3,

so that both rpc-simple (old), and, latest rpc test cases are run.

This will automatically take care of:
1) ltp/testscripts/networktests.sh, and,
2) ltp/testscripts/networkstress.sh,

I am still to apply any of your Patches to LTP. It would be great if you
can send me:

1) An updated complete (everything) Patch settling all the above issues,
which also includes the new test cases, (Patch over latest LTP CVS
diff),and,
2) Results of test run post patching.

Regards--
Subrata

> --Subrata
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Aurélien
> > 
> > 
> > Subrata Modak wrote:
> > 
> > >On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 18:55 +0100, Aurélien Charbon wrote:
> > >  
> > >
> > >>Hi,
> > >>
> > >>The patch i sent does not completely delete the existing testcases for 
> > >>RPC.
> > >>In fact some simple tests were already in directory testcases/network/rpc.
> > >>The patch places the existing tests in testcases/network/rpc/simple_tests
> > >>The new ones are in testcases/network/rpc/rpc-tirpc-full-test-suite
> > >>
> > >>This must disturb the test launcher because I forgot to modify the rpc 
> > >>script (in runtest directory)
> > >>I think this patch should fix the problem.
> > >>
> > >>    
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >Have you run the tests after applying this patch. If yes, please provide
> > >us with the results of the same test run post patch applied. It would be
> > >great if you can also highlight the test result for the new additions
> > >against the old one.
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to