Quoting Stephen Smalley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 16:43 -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > Sergei,
> > >
> > > I have merged Stephen?? Patches sent on 24/01/2008, which modifies:
> > >
> > > ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/README
> > > ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/misc/sbin_deprecated.patch
> > >
> > > Could you let me know whether this replaces the need for your Patch, or
> > > your Patch (sent on 29/01/2008) is still needed to be applied. If
> >
> > Sigh, this gets to be a pain since I'm sending a patch to a patch :)
> > But attached are two patches still needed on top of today's cvs.
> >
> > Stephen, actually with these patches the testsuite hangs at
> > selinux_create. I need unconfined_runs_test() to give $1
> > unconfined_t:process { sigchld}, which the patch I sent earlier did.
> > The patch you had sent out didn't, so I just wnat to make sure - is
> > there a reason not to do that?
>
> No, that's fine - you have to allow the caller to reap the child. I'm
Ok, Subrata, to keep things simple please let me know when you've
applied my two patches, then I'll fetch a new ltp tree and make the last
one-line patch on top of that.
> surprised though that I don't encounter the same problem, unless perhaps
> such permission is globally granted in the latest
> selinux-policy-targeted update on Fedora 8.
Ah, maybe that is the reason you get fewer failures than I do - I
applied no updates other than to install the selinux-policy-devel
package.
thanks,
-serge
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
